In Romania there organizations that work without all the gorge decade nepotism and favoritism, anyw

I'm on the train and read the title sideways a foot kind of a newspaper read by everyone free, "Moni, bride euro for 3000." Moni did not know who he is or what is its conception of the good life, but the news has caused me an immediate and unpleasant. Regardless of the identity of this person, one thing seemed clear: there should be only 3000 euro bride. Nor for more.
Later I found out that it was the most publicized model in Romania, Monica Columbeanu, and that there had been only an innocent glamour beauty podium scroll wedding dress: my pilot light priori feminist nothing. I read the full article and found out that rather it communicates something positive from the perspective of developing attitudes: a young mother can earn 3000 euros for a few hours work. It therefore social and financial autonomy, glamour beauty which departs significantly glamour beauty from the status of a victim and propels the scope of being an agent. It's a good sign, I told myself. But feminist pilot light in my head all gave me no peace.
And then I realized why: I was induced idiosyncrasy way this sale was fully presented by the press. The ambiguity of the title was intentionally veiled express disapproval of the voice of the majority or maybe its just disbelief that a woman of 23 years can earn "honest" so much money in so little time title was not innocent, but wearing a subliminal message: readers suggest that for to be gained in life have two chances: either to marry, parent-embracing glamour beauty model wife housewife or be "independent" and "modern" that appear on the glass or on paper as quickly and as available as possible glamour beauty . Both appear archetypes embodied by young Monica and this causes unwanted contrary: on the one hand does not agree this is something almost obscene archetypal synthesis of Neprivind, glamour beauty but fascinating. On the other hand well-chosen title has the potential to send a message that even the star because I do not think he wants to convey: it is acceptable to be Wedding for 3000 euro and behold, this can lead to the heights of social status . *
In the year of grace 2010, the girls from Romania are not learned, no school, no home, to confront, to create, to love and respect themselves, but rather to please others (usually men or any holder of power) glamour beauty to be girls 'good'. Therefore I have ambivalent about a media figure as the above: even though glamour beauty it arrogant and inappropriate for me to questioning glamour beauty life choices, individual preferences are sacrosanct, I still have a problem. I am unhappy with the story created around him by the press and in no way neutral "ideological" in this case, it was suggested, more or less subtly, in terms of symbolic white of the dress is contradicted of the 3000 euro.
But I realized that my ambivalence is rooted in a conceptual confusion: a false dichotomy - Madonna versus "modern independent" - and a false equivalence between an archetype and embodiment of worldly. On this double confusion that I tricked me for a moment, is based rhetorical virtues of a tabloid headline like "Moni, bride euro for 3000."
I am concerned that, perhaps against their will, Moni is a role model for many young women. Because social, conceptual confusion above is dangerous, and explaining its importance, and because I know that fame is perverse, glamour beauty for all these reasons, I think it still deserves to be feminist in Romania, 2010 .
In Romania there organizations that work without all the gorge decade nepotism and favoritism, anywhere but here corrupt organization goes dinanintea corruption organization. That must be self-feminist women and a way to be that is to find a man who understands the cause, not to push it or many other measures on their own, etc.
I do not know if an explicit declaration that you do not consider yourself an ideal spares no moral responsibility as long as you own initiative promoted (I mean the reality glamour beauty show that airs on a station for television stations). I do not believe that no one should be accused of indiscriminate someone (anyone). If we fail to discern the problem is in our own backyard.
I live in Montreal for several years and are fully tasted the feminist glamour beauty associations in Montreal pretext of good causes that do nothing to convert every day all women to be more 'independent' and 'equal' to men. The result: the new generation of a Montreal glamour beauty became worthless whores. Tie and sick to look at them: not only think PooouulLA. Under the umbrella of emancipation parachutes are not static rather than to 'recovery